Residual Waste: The Ultimate Guide You NEED to Know!

Effective waste management significantly reduces the volume of residual waste requiring final disposal. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides guidelines influencing best practices concerning residual waste handling. Landfills often serve as the final destination for residual waste that cannot be recycled or composted. Understanding the characteristics of residual waste allows stakeholders, including organizations like the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA), to develop sustainable and economically viable disposal strategies.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Milieu Service Nederland , from the video titled What happens to your Residual waste? .

The modern world grapples with a monumental waste problem. Mountains of discarded materials accumulate daily, posing a significant threat to the environment and human health. While recycling initiatives and waste reduction programs gain traction, a substantial portion of waste remains unaddressed: residual waste.

Understanding what constitutes residual waste, the scale of its generation, and the consequences of its improper management is crucial for developing effective and sustainable waste management strategies. This section will delve into these aspects, laying the foundation for a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with residual waste.

Defining Residual Waste: What It Is and Why It Matters

Residual waste, in its simplest form, refers to the waste that remains after all feasible efforts at source reduction, reuse, recycling, and other forms of recovery have been exhausted. It represents the fraction of the waste stream that cannot be readily reintegrated into the economic cycle or safely returned to the environment through existing technologies and practices.

This definition is crucial because it highlights the importance of prioritizing waste reduction and resource recovery before resorting to disposal. Residual waste is not simply "trash"; it is what's left after everything else has been tried.

Understanding the composition of residual waste is also vital. It can include a mixture of materials, from non-recyclable plastics and contaminated paper to textiles and other complex composites. The specific composition varies based on local consumption patterns, recycling infrastructure, and waste management practices.

Why does residual waste matter? Because its improper management leads to a cascade of negative consequences:

• Environmental pollution: Landfills can leach harmful substances into the soil and groundwater.
• Greenhouse gas emissions: Decomposing organic waste in landfills generates methane, a potent greenhouse gas.
• Resource depletion: Valuable materials are lost, perpetuating a linear "take-make-dispose" economic model.
• Public health risks: Improperly managed waste can attract disease vectors and contaminate air and water sources.

The Scope of the Problem: Global MSW Generation and the Role of Residual Waste

The sheer volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated globally is staggering. According to the World Bank, cities worldwide generated 2.01 billion tonnes of MSW annually in 2016, a figure projected to increase to 3.40 billion tonnes by 2050.

This escalating waste generation rate is driven by factors such as population growth, urbanization, and increasing consumption levels.

While global efforts to promote recycling and waste reduction are underway, a substantial portion of MSW still ends up as residual waste. The exact percentage varies widely across countries and regions, depending on the effectiveness of their waste management systems.

However, even in countries with advanced recycling infrastructure, a significant amount of waste remains unrecyclable due to technological limitations, economic constraints, or contamination issues. This portion constitutes the residual waste stream, which requires careful management to minimize its environmental impact.

The challenge is particularly acute in developing countries, where waste management infrastructure is often inadequate. In these regions, a large proportion of MSW is typically disposed of in open dumps or landfills, leading to significant environmental and public health problems.

Importance of Understanding Residual Waste Management

Effective residual waste management is not about simply disposing of unwanted materials. It's about understanding the complex interplay of environmental, economic, and social factors that influence waste generation and disposal patterns. It requires a holistic and integrated approach that considers the entire lifecycle of materials, from production to consumption to end-of-life management.

A deeper understanding of residual waste management is vital for:

• Developing effective waste management policies and regulations: Informed policies can incentivize waste reduction, promote recycling, and ensure the safe and environmentally sound disposal of residual waste.
• Investing in appropriate waste management technologies: Different technologies, such as advanced sorting systems, waste-to-energy facilities, and engineered landfills, can play a role in reducing the volume and toxicity of residual waste.
• Promoting a circular economy: By viewing waste as a resource, we can create closed-loop systems where materials are continuously reused and recycled, minimizing the need for disposal.
• Raising public awareness: Educating the public about the importance of waste reduction and responsible waste management practices can empower individuals to make informed choices that reduce their environmental footprint.

In conclusion, understanding residual waste and its significance is the first step towards creating a more sustainable and circular future. By recognizing the environmental and public health risks associated with improper residual waste management, we can work together to develop innovative solutions that minimize waste generation, maximize resource recovery, and protect our planet for future generations.

The Waste Hierarchy: Placing Residual Waste in Context

Understanding residual waste necessitates situating it within the broader framework of waste management principles. The Waste Hierarchy provides this crucial context, outlining a prioritized order of preference for managing waste, aiming to extract maximum practical benefits from products and generate the minimum amount of waste. It's a cornerstone of modern waste management strategy.

The Waste Hierarchy: A Framework for Waste Management

The Waste Hierarchy is typically represented as an inverted pyramid, with the most desirable options at the top and the least desirable at the bottom. This visual representation emphasizes the need to prioritize prevention and minimization over disposal. The general order of preference is:

• Prevention
• Preparing for Reuse
• Recycling
• Other Recovery (e.g., Energy Recovery)
• Disposal

This hierarchy isn't just a theoretical model; it's a practical guide for policymakers, businesses, and individuals to make informed decisions about waste management. Each level plays a vital role in reducing environmental impact and promoting resource efficiency.

Prevention and Minimization: Reducing Waste at the Source

Prevention is the most preferred option in the Waste Hierarchy. It involves avoiding waste generation in the first place.

This can be achieved through various strategies, including:

• Designing products with longer lifespans
• Reducing packaging
• Promoting mindful consumption habits
• Supporting product sharing and rental services

Minimization complements prevention by reducing the quantity and harmfulness of waste generated. This can be accomplished by using materials more efficiently, implementing cleaner production processes, and optimizing product design. Effective prevention and minimization strategies are the foundation of sustainable waste management.

Preparing for Reuse and Recycling: Maximizing Resource Recovery

When waste prevention isn't possible, the next best option is preparing for reuse. This involves repairing, refurbishing, or cleaning used products so they can be used again for their original purpose. Reuse extends the lifespan of products.

Recycling, the third level of the hierarchy, involves processing waste materials into new products. This reduces the need for virgin materials, conserves energy, and minimizes pollution.

Effective recycling programs require:

• Proper sorting and collection systems
• Advanced processing technologies
• Active participation from individuals and businesses

Recycling plays a critical role in transitioning towards a circular economy.

Other Recovery (e.g. Energy Recovery): Minimizing Final Disposal

If waste cannot be reused or recycled, other recovery options, such as energy recovery, can be considered. Energy recovery typically involves incinerating waste to generate electricity or heat.

While controversial, waste-to-energy (WtE) plants can reduce the volume of waste sent to landfills and provide a source of renewable energy. However, it's crucial to implement strict air pollution control measures to minimize environmental impacts.

Disposal: Landfill is the Least Desirable Option, but Still Important

Disposal, usually in landfills, is the least preferred option in the Waste Hierarchy. Landfilling involves burying waste in specially designed sites. Modern landfills are engineered to minimize environmental risks.

However, they still pose challenges, including:

• Methane emissions
• Leachate contamination
• Land use

While efforts are being made to reduce reliance on landfills, they will likely remain a necessary part of waste management systems for the foreseeable future.

Defining Residual Waste in the Context of the Waste Hierarchy: What's Left After All Other Options?

Residual waste, therefore, occupies the very bottom of the Waste Hierarchy. It is what remains after all feasible efforts at prevention, reuse, recycling, and other recovery have been exhausted. Understanding this placement is critical.

It highlights the following key points:

• Residual waste is not simply "trash"; it represents the limit of our current technological and behavioral capabilities.
• The amount of residual waste generated reflects the effectiveness of upstream waste management strategies.
• Effective management of residual waste requires a focus on minimizing its volume and potential environmental impacts.

By understanding the Waste Hierarchy and the place of residual waste within it, we can develop more effective and sustainable waste management strategies. It emphasizes the need to prioritize waste reduction and resource recovery before resorting to disposal, promoting a more circular and environmentally responsible approach.

Current Methods for Managing Residual Waste: Landfills and Incineration

Even with robust waste prevention, reuse, and recycling programs, a significant portion of waste remains, classified as residual waste. How societies manage this residual waste stream has profound implications for environmental health and resource sustainability. Currently, the two most prevalent methods for dealing with residual waste are landfilling and incineration, each with its own set of advantages, disadvantages, and evolving technological approaches.

Landfills: A Common but Controversial Solution

For decades, landfills have served as the primary destination for residual waste. Their widespread use is largely due to their relative simplicity and cost-effectiveness compared to other waste management options, at least in the short term.

However, landfills are far from a perfect solution, raising a number of environmental and social concerns that necessitate ongoing scrutiny and innovation.

Types of Landfills and Their Operation

Landfills are not simply open dumps; modern landfills are engineered facilities designed to contain waste and minimize environmental contamination.

Sanitary landfills are the most common type, employing a system of liners, leachate collection, and gas management to prevent pollutants from seeping into the surrounding soil and groundwater.

Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills specifically accept household waste, commercial waste, and non-hazardous industrial waste.

The operation of a landfill involves compacting waste into layers, covering it with soil or other materials, and continuously monitoring environmental conditions.

Environmental Concerns: Methane Emissions, Leachate, and Land Use

Despite advancements in landfill technology, several environmental concerns persist.

Methane emissions are a major issue, as the anaerobic decomposition of organic waste in landfills generates this potent greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to climate change.

Leachate, a contaminated liquid formed when rainwater percolates through the waste, poses a risk of groundwater contamination if not properly managed.

Land use is another significant consideration, as landfills require large areas of land, which can lead to habitat destruction and aesthetic concerns.

Furthermore, the siting of landfills often raises environmental justice issues, as they are disproportionately located in low-income communities and communities of color.

The Future of Landfilling: Innovations and Regulations

Recognizing the limitations of traditional landfilling, efforts are underway to improve landfill design and operation.

Landfill gas capture systems are becoming increasingly common, capturing methane emissions and using them to generate electricity or heat.

Bioreactor landfills enhance waste decomposition through the addition of liquids and nutrients, accelerating stabilization and increasing gas production.

Stricter regulations are also being implemented to minimize environmental impacts and promote more sustainable waste management practices.

Despite these innovations, landfilling remains a less desirable option compared to waste prevention, reuse, and recycling.

Incineration: Reducing Volume, Generating Energy

Incineration, also known as waste-to-energy (WtE), involves burning waste at high temperatures, reducing its volume and, in some cases, generating electricity or heat.

Incineration offers several potential benefits, including significant volume reduction, destruction of pathogens, and energy recovery.

However, it also raises concerns about air pollution and the management of ash residue.

How Incineration Works: The Process of Burning Waste

Modern incinerators are sophisticated facilities equipped with advanced pollution control technologies.

The incineration process typically involves feeding waste into a combustion chamber, where it is burned at temperatures ranging from 850°C to over 1000°C.

The heat generated during combustion is used to produce steam, which can then be used to generate electricity or provide district heating.

The residual ash is either landfilled or, in some cases, used as a construction material.

Air Pollution Concerns and Mitigation Technologies

Historically, air pollution has been a major concern associated with incineration.

However, modern incinerators are equipped with advanced air pollution control technologies, such as scrubbers, filters, and catalytic converters, to remove pollutants from the exhaust gases.

These technologies can significantly reduce emissions of particulate matter, dioxins, furans, nitrogen oxides, and other harmful substances.

Continuous monitoring and strict regulatory standards are essential to ensure that incinerators operate safely and minimize air pollution.

Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Plants: Recovering Value from Waste

Waste-to-Energy (WtE) plants represent a form of resource recovery, converting the energy content of waste into a usable form.

WtE plants can generate a reliable source of electricity or heat, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.

However, the economic viability of WtE plants depends on factors such as waste composition, energy prices, and the cost of pollution control technologies.

Furthermore, public acceptance of WtE plants can be challenging due to concerns about air pollution and potential impacts on recycling rates.

Waste Diversion Strategies for Reducing Residual Waste

Reducing the amount of waste that ends up in landfills or incinerators is crucial for promoting sustainable waste management.

Waste diversion strategies aim to divert waste away from disposal facilities and towards more beneficial uses, such as recycling, composting, and reuse.

Improving Recycling Programs: Addressing Limitations and Challenges

Effective recycling programs are essential for maximizing resource recovery and reducing the amount of residual waste.

However, recycling programs face several limitations and challenges.

Contamination of recyclable materials with non-recyclable items can significantly reduce the quality and marketability of recycled products.

Lack of standardized recycling systems across different regions can create confusion and hinder participation.

Fluctuations in commodity prices for recycled materials can affect the economic viability of recycling programs.

Addressing these challenges requires investments in public education, improved sorting technologies, and stronger partnerships between governments, businesses, and communities.

Circular Economy and Extended Producer Responsibility: Sustainable Solutions

While landfills and incineration represent the realities of current residual waste management, they are increasingly seen as stopgap measures, not long-term solutions. The environmental and social costs associated with these methods demand a shift towards more sustainable and circular approaches. Two prominent strategies gaining traction are the Circular Economy and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), each offering a distinct yet complementary pathway toward minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

The Circular Economy: A Paradigm Shift in Resource Management

The Circular Economy represents a fundamental departure from the traditional linear "take-make-dispose" model. Instead of viewing end-of-life products as waste, it envisions a closed-loop system where resources are continuously cycled back into the economy.

This model emphasizes designing products and systems for durability, reuse, and recyclability, minimizing waste generation at every stage of the product lifecycle.

Moving Beyond the Linear Model: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and More

At its core, the Circular Economy builds upon the familiar principles of reduce, reuse, and recycle. However, it expands these concepts to encompass a broader range of strategies, including:

• Reducing material consumption through dematerialization and resource efficiency.
• Reusing products and components through repair, refurbishment, and remanufacturing.
• Recycling materials back into new products, closing the loop on resource flows.

Beyond these, the Circular Economy also promotes innovative approaches such as:

• Rethinking product design to minimize waste and maximize resource utilization.
• Refurbishing used products to extend their lifespan and maintain their value.
• Repurposing materials and products for new applications.

Designing for Durability, Repairability, and Recyclability: The Key to Circularity

A cornerstone of the Circular Economy is designing products with their entire lifecycle in mind. This involves considering factors such as:

• Durability: Creating products that are built to last, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
• Repairability: Designing products that are easy to repair and maintain, extending their lifespan.
• Recyclability: Using materials that are easily recyclable and designing products that can be readily disassembled for recycling.

By incorporating these design principles, manufacturers can significantly reduce waste generation and create products that contribute to a more circular economy.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Holding Producers Accountable

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is an environmental policy approach that holds producers accountable for the end-of-life management of their products.

This means that manufacturers take responsibility for the collection, treatment, and disposal of their products after they have reached the end of their useful life.

What is EPR and How Does it Work?

EPR programs typically involve producers paying a fee to fund the collection and recycling of their products.

This fee can be based on factors such as the weight or volume of the product, the type of materials used, and the ease of recycling.

The funds collected are then used to support recycling infrastructure, collection programs, and public awareness campaigns.

In some cases, producers may also be required to take back their products directly, either through their own collection systems or through partnerships with waste management companies.

Examples of Successful EPR Programs Around the World

EPR programs have been implemented in various countries around the world, with varying degrees of success. Some notable examples include:

• Germany's Packaging Ordinance: This program holds producers responsible for the collection and recycling of packaging waste. It has been credited with significantly increasing recycling rates in Germany.
• Canada's Electronic Waste Programs: Several Canadian provinces have implemented EPR programs for electronic waste, requiring producers to fund the collection and recycling of e-waste.
• European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive: This directive sets targets for the collection, recycling, and recovery of electronic waste across the EU.

Benefits of EPR: Reduced Waste, Increased Recycling, and Innovation

EPR programs offer a range of benefits, including:

• Reduced waste: By holding producers accountable for end-of-life management, EPR incentivizes them to design products that are easier to recycle and less likely to end up in landfills.
• Increased recycling: EPR programs provide funding for recycling infrastructure and collection programs, leading to higher recycling rates.
• Innovation: EPR can encourage producers to innovate and develop new products and materials that are more environmentally friendly and easier to recycle.

By shifting the responsibility for waste management to producers, EPR can drive significant improvements in resource efficiency and waste reduction.

The Role of Waste Management Companies in Handling Residual Waste

The principles and strategies of the Circular Economy and Extended Producer Responsibility provide a framework for a more sustainable future. However, the practical implementation of these concepts often falls to waste management companies. These entities stand at the forefront of dealing with the complex realities of residual waste. They are essential in bridging the gap between policy goals and on-the-ground waste processing.

Waste management companies play a multifaceted role in the handling of residual waste, far exceeding the simple act of collection and disposal. Their activities encompass a broad spectrum of services, from designing and implementing waste collection programs to operating complex treatment facilities. They also try to navigate an ever-evolving regulatory landscape. This section will explore these roles, the challenges these companies face, and the critical importance of their work in the overall waste management ecosystem.

Core Activities of Waste Management Companies

Waste management companies provide a range of essential services, often working closely with municipalities, industries, and individual consumers.

• Waste Collection and Transportation: The most visible aspect of their work involves collecting waste from various sources (residential, commercial, and industrial). It also involves transporting it to appropriate processing or disposal facilities. This requires optimized logistics, route planning, and a diverse fleet of specialized vehicles.

• Sorting and Processing: Many companies operate material recovery facilities (MRFs) where recyclable materials are sorted, processed, and prepared for sale to manufacturers. This stage is crucial for maximizing resource recovery and minimizing the amount of waste sent to landfills.

• Treatment and Disposal: For residual waste that cannot be recycled or otherwise recovered, waste management companies oversee treatment and disposal operations. This may involve operating landfills, waste-to-energy plants, or other specialized facilities designed to minimize environmental impact.

• Waste Diversion Programs: Companies are increasingly involved in developing and implementing waste diversion programs, such as composting initiatives or programs designed to promote source reduction and recycling. This proactive approach aims to reduce the overall volume of residual waste generated.

Challenges Faced by Waste Management Companies

Despite their critical role, waste management companies face numerous challenges that can impact their effectiveness and profitability.

• Fluctuating Commodity Prices: The economics of recycling are heavily influenced by commodity prices. When prices for recycled materials drop, it can become financially unviable to process certain materials, leading to increased landfilling.

• Contamination of Recyclables: High contamination rates in recycling streams pose a significant challenge. Contamination requires additional sorting and processing, increases costs, and can ultimately reduce the quality and marketability of recycled materials. Public education and outreach are essential to address this issue.

• Stringent Regulations: Waste management companies operate under a complex web of environmental regulations that vary by jurisdiction. Complying with these regulations requires significant investment in technology, infrastructure, and personnel. Regulations related to landfill management, air emissions, and water quality can be particularly demanding.

• Public Perception and NIMBYism: Waste management facilities, such as landfills and incinerators, often face public opposition due to concerns about odor, noise, and potential environmental impacts. This "Not In My Backyard" (NIMBY) attitude can make it difficult to site new facilities or expand existing ones.

• Technological Advancements: The waste management industry is constantly evolving with new technologies and approaches. Companies must stay abreast of these advancements and invest in new equipment and processes to remain competitive and improve their environmental performance.

Optimizing Waste Collection Programs

Effective waste collection programs are the foundation of any successful waste management system. These programs must be designed to be efficient, convenient, and accessible to all residents and businesses.

• Curbside Collection: Curbside collection programs are a common approach for residential waste. These programs typically involve residents placing their waste in designated containers for collection on a regular schedule. Single-stream recycling, where all recyclables are collected together, has become increasingly popular, although it can also increase contamination rates.

• Drop-off Centers: Drop-off centers provide a convenient option for residents to dispose of bulky items, household hazardous waste, or recyclable materials that are not accepted in curbside programs. These centers can play a crucial role in diverting waste from landfills.

• Commercial and Industrial Collection: Waste management companies also provide collection services for businesses and industries. These services may involve specialized containers, compactors, or other equipment to handle large volumes of waste. Tailored programs are often developed to meet the specific needs of each customer.

• Technology Integration: Modern waste collection programs increasingly rely on technology to improve efficiency and optimize routes. GPS tracking, RFID tags, and smart sensors can provide real-time data on waste generation and collection patterns, enabling companies to make data-driven decisions.

By optimizing their collection programs, embracing technological innovation, and actively engaging with communities, waste management companies can play a pivotal role in creating a more sustainable and circular waste management system. The challenges are significant, but the potential benefits – a cleaner environment, resource conservation, and a healthier planet – are well worth the effort.

The insights gleaned from understanding the operations of waste management companies set the stage for a broader consideration of the regulatory landscape shaping their actions, and indeed, the entire trajectory of residual waste management. These policies don't just dictate how waste is handled. They are the levers that incentivize innovation, enforce environmental responsibility, and ultimately steer society towards a more sustainable relationship with its waste.

Policy, Regulation, and the Future of Residual Waste Management

Effective policy and robust regulation are the cornerstones of a successful residual waste management system. These frameworks provide the necessary guidelines, incentives, and enforcement mechanisms to drive sustainable practices.

This section delves into the critical role of policy and regulation. It considers how they influence residual waste management strategies globally.

The European Union (EU) Waste Framework Directive: A Leading Example

The EU Waste Framework Directive stands as a landmark piece of legislation, setting ambitious targets and establishing a clear hierarchy for waste management across its member states.

Its emphasis on waste prevention, reuse, and recycling serves as a model for other regions seeking to reduce their reliance on landfilling and incineration.

Key Components and Impact

The Directive's core principles include the polluter pays principle, extended producer responsibility, and the establishment of binding recycling targets. These measures collectively aim to minimize waste generation, maximize resource recovery, and promote a circular economy.

The EU Waste Framework Directive has spurred significant advancements in waste management infrastructure and practices across Europe.

Member states have implemented innovative recycling programs. They also promote eco-design principles. These advances have contributed to a substantial reduction in the amount of waste sent to landfills.

Lessons Learned and Global Influence

The EU's experience offers valuable lessons for other countries grappling with residual waste challenges. Its integrated approach, combining regulatory requirements with economic incentives and public awareness campaigns, demonstrates the effectiveness of a comprehensive policy framework.

The Directive's influence extends beyond Europe. It serves as a blueprint for developing nations seeking to establish sustainable waste management systems.

Future Trends in Residual Waste Management

The field of residual waste management is constantly evolving. Emerging technologies, changing societal attitudes, and increasing environmental concerns are driving innovation and shaping future trends.

Advanced Waste Treatment Technologies

Advanced Waste Treatment (AWT) technologies, such as gasification, pyrolysis, and anaerobic digestion, are gaining traction as alternatives to traditional incineration.

These processes offer the potential to convert residual waste into valuable energy products. They also can create secondary raw materials, further reducing the need for landfilling.

Smart Waste Management Systems

The integration of digital technologies, such as sensors, data analytics, and artificial intelligence, is transforming waste management practices.

Smart waste management systems enable real-time monitoring of waste generation patterns. They can optimize collection routes and improve the efficiency of sorting and processing facilities.

These systems can also enhance transparency and accountability in the waste management chain.

Focus on Contaminants of Emerging Concern

Growing awareness of the presence of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), microplastics, and other contaminants of emerging concern in residual waste is driving the development of new treatment technologies and regulatory measures.

Advanced treatment processes are being designed to remove or destroy these harmful substances, minimizing their potential impact on human health and the environment.

The Path Forward: Towards a Sustainable and Circular Future

The future of residual waste management lies in embracing a holistic and integrated approach that prioritizes waste prevention, resource recovery, and responsible disposal.

Collaboration and Stakeholder Engagement

Effective waste management requires collaboration among governments, businesses, researchers, and the public.

Stakeholder engagement is crucial for developing and implementing successful policies and programs. This encourages shared responsibility and promotes a sense of ownership.

Investing in Infrastructure and Innovation

Substantial investments in waste management infrastructure, including recycling facilities, AWT plants, and smart waste management systems, are essential for achieving a circular economy.

Supporting research and development of innovative technologies can further enhance the efficiency and sustainability of waste management practices.

Promoting Sustainable Consumption Patterns

Ultimately, reducing the amount of residual waste requires a shift towards more sustainable consumption patterns. This includes reducing overall consumption, choosing durable and repairable products, and participating actively in recycling and composting programs.

By embracing these principles, we can minimize the environmental impact of residual waste and create a more sustainable future for generations to come.

Video: Residual Waste: The Ultimate Guide You NEED to Know!

Play Video