Blood Typing in Crime: Unlocking Justice at the Cellular Level
In the realm of forensic science, blood typing stands as a crucial analytical method. The American Academy of Forensic Sciences emphasizes its importance for individual identification. The ABO blood group system, a fundamental principle, allows for categorizing blood based on specific antigens. This technique assists forensic laboratories in associating or dissociating suspects from crime scenes. Therefore, when considering what is the purpose of blood typing in criminalogy, the answer resides in its ability to provide vital clues linking individuals to criminal acts through the analysis of biological evidence.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Medical Centric , from the video titled The Mystery of Blood Typing: The Facts You Need to Know About Your Blood! .
Imagine a crime scene: Yellow tape surrounds a seemingly ordinary room, but within lies a puzzle woven with secrets and potential evidence. Among the tools used to unlock these secrets, blood typing, a fundamental technique in forensic science, can offer crucial insights.
While often overshadowed by the precision of DNA analysis in modern investigations, blood typing continues to play a vital, albeit sometimes understated, role in the pursuit of justice.
A Case from the Past: Blood Type to the Rescue
Consider the case of Buck Ruxton, a British physician convicted in 1936 of murdering his wife and housemaid. The victims' dismembered remains were discovered scattered across Scotland, making identification incredibly challenging. Traditional methods proved insufficient.
It was through meticulous blood typing of the recovered tissues and comparison with the known blood types of the missing women that authorities were able to establish a critical link. This pivotal piece of evidence helped solidify the case against Ruxton, ultimately leading to his conviction.
The Ruxton case exemplifies how, even in the early days of forensic science, blood typing provided a critical stepping stone toward identifying victims and building compelling cases.
Forensic Science: Unveiling the Truth
Forensic science is the application of scientific principles and techniques to matters of law. It encompasses a wide range of disciplines, including pathology, toxicology, ballistics, and, of course, serology, which includes blood typing.
The overarching goal of forensic science is to provide objective evidence that can be used to support or refute allegations in a court of law.
Blood typing, in this context, serves as a powerful investigative tool, capable of providing valuable information about individuals involved in a crime, even when other forms of identification are unavailable or inconclusive.
Thesis: Enduring Value in the Age of DNA
While DNA analysis has revolutionized forensic science, blood typing (ABO and Rh) retains significant value. It serves to narrow suspect pools, identify victims, and reconstruct crime scene events. Its speed and cost-effectiveness make it a valuable tool, particularly in cases where DNA analysis is not feasible or necessary. Despite advancements in technology, the basic principles of blood typing continue to offer a reliable method for gleaning crucial information in criminal investigations.
The Ruxton case exemplifies how, even in the early days of forensic science, blood typing provided a critical stepping stone toward identifying victims and building compelling cases. But what exactly is blood typing, and how does it work? The following section delves into the science behind this essential forensic tool, exploring the ABO blood groups, the Rh factor, and the intricate dance of antigens and antibodies that defines our individual blood types.
The Science Behind Blood: ABO and Rh Explained
At its core, blood typing relies on the principle that our blood carries unique identifiers, which are the foundation for differentiating blood groups and informing forensic investigations. Understanding these identifiers—the ABO blood group system and the Rhesus (Rh) factor—is crucial to grasping the full value of blood typing in forensics.
Decoding the ABO Blood Group System
The ABO blood group system, discovered by Karl Landsteiner in the early 1900s, is based on the presence or absence of two antigens – A and B – on the surface of red blood cells. These antigens act as flags, signaling the blood's identity.
- Type A: Red blood cells have A antigens.
- Type B: Red blood cells have B antigens.
- Type AB: Red blood cells have both A and B antigens.
- Type O: Red blood cells have neither A nor B antigens.
Corresponding to these antigens are antibodies found in the blood plasma. Antibodies are proteins that recognize and bind to foreign antigens, triggering an immune response.
- Type A individuals have anti-B antibodies.
- Type B individuals have anti-A antibodies.
- Type AB individuals have neither anti-A nor anti-B antibodies.
- Type O individuals have both anti-A and anti-B antibodies.
The Rhesus (Rh) Factor
In addition to the ABO system, the Rh factor, also known as the D antigen, plays a critical role in blood typing. If the Rh factor is present on the red blood cells, the blood is classified as Rh-positive (Rh+). If it's absent, the blood is Rh-negative (Rh-).
The Rh factor is particularly important in cases involving blood transfusions and pregnancies, as Rh incompatibility can lead to serious complications.
The Dance of Antigens and Antibodies
Blood typing involves testing a blood sample for the presence of A and B antigens and the Rh factor. This is typically done by mixing the blood sample with antibodies against each antigen. If the antigen is present, the corresponding antibodies will bind to it, causing the red blood cells to clump together, a process called agglutination.
For example, if a blood sample agglutinates when mixed with anti-A antibodies but not with anti-B antibodies, the blood type is A. If it agglutinates with both anti-A and anti-B antibodies, the blood type is AB. If it doesn't agglutinate with either, the blood type is O.
The presence or absence of agglutination reveals the blood type, providing crucial information for forensic investigations.
The Genetics of Blood Type
Blood type is inherited, meaning it's passed down from parents to their children. The ABO blood type is determined by a single gene with three possible alleles: A, B, and O. Each individual inherits two alleles, one from each parent, resulting in six possible genotypes: AA, AO, BB, BO, AB, and OO.
The A and B alleles are co-dominant, meaning that if both are present (AB genotype), both A and B antigens will be expressed. The O allele is recessive, meaning that it will only be expressed if two copies of the O allele are present (OO genotype).
The Rh factor is also inherited, with the Rh+ allele being dominant over the Rh- allele.
Understanding the genetic basis of blood type can be helpful in paternity testing and in tracing family lineages in certain forensic investigations. While not as precise as DNA analysis, blood type inheritance patterns can provide valuable clues.
The science behind blood typing, particularly understanding the ABO and Rh systems, provides the necessary foundation for grasping its impact on forensic science. But its true significance emerges when we examine how this knowledge was initially applied and refined in the pursuit of justice.
A Historical Perspective: Blood Typing's Pioneering Role in Criminology
Early Applications of Serology in Investigations
The history of blood typing in criminology is a story of scientific innovation gradually finding its place in the legal system. Early uses of serology—the study of blood serum and other bodily fluids—laid the groundwork for what would become blood typing. Before the ability to categorize blood groups precisely, scientists could only identify blood as being of human origin.
Even this limited capacity proved invaluable. It allowed investigators to confirm whether a stain was indeed blood, distinguishing it from other substances that might resemble it. This capability was vital in the early 20th century when microscopic analysis and basic chemical tests were the primary tools available.
As serological techniques advanced, scientists began to explore the subtle differences between blood samples. The discovery of ABO blood groups by Karl Landsteiner in 1901 was a watershed moment. It introduced the concept that blood wasn't uniform but could be classified into distinct categories based on specific antigens.
This realization marked the beginning of blood typing as a means to differentiate individuals, opening the door to its application in criminal investigations.
Landmark Cases Where Blood Typing Was Pivotal
Blood typing began to play a pivotal role in landmark cases. Although DNA analysis is now the gold standard, there were instances where blood typing helped narrow suspect pools and strengthen cases.
One notable case involved disputed paternity, showcasing the technique's power to exclude individuals. While not definitive proof, the exclusion of a suspect based on blood type was crucial, altering the trajectory of the investigation.
Another case involved a robbery where bloodstains were left at the scene. Through blood typing, investigators were able to determine that the blood belonged to someone with type B blood, which was relatively uncommon in the local population.
This information significantly narrowed the list of potential suspects and focused the investigation, eventually leading to the apprehension of the perpetrator. These examples illustrate the practical impact of blood typing in the early days of forensic science.
Blood Typing as a Cornerstone of Criminalistics and Forensic Science
The evolution of criminalistics and forensic science owes a considerable debt to blood typing. It served as a foundational element, bridging the gap between basic scientific inquiry and its application in legal contexts.
The standardization of blood typing procedures, the development of reagents for accurate blood group determination, and the integration of these techniques into routine investigative protocols all contributed to the professionalization of forensic science.
The rise of forensic laboratories and the training of specialized personnel reflected the growing importance of scientific evidence in courtrooms. Blood typing was not just a laboratory test but a crucial investigative tool that shaped the way crime scenes were analyzed and evidence was presented.
While newer techniques like DNA analysis have eclipsed blood typing in terms of discriminatory power, it is essential to recognize its pioneering role. Blood typing paved the way for more sophisticated forensic methods, and it remains a testament to the enduring value of scientific innovation in the pursuit of justice.
The discovery of distinct blood groups transformed criminology, offering a new lens through which investigators could view crime scenes. But understanding its history and scientific underpinnings is only part of the story. The true impact of blood typing is revealed when we examine its practical application in crime scene investigations, where it becomes a tangible tool in the pursuit of justice.
Blood at the Scene: Applications of Blood Typing in Crime Scene Investigation
The crime scene is a silent witness, holding clues that can unravel the truth behind a criminal act. Among these clues, blood evidence often plays a crucial role, and blood typing, despite the rise of DNA analysis, remains a valuable asset in its interpretation.
Locating and Preserving Blood Evidence
The first step in utilizing blood typing at a crime scene is the meticulous location and preservation of blood evidence. This process demands careful attention to detail, as the integrity of the sample directly impacts the accuracy of subsequent analysis.
Investigators must systematically survey the scene, documenting any visible bloodstains, spatters, or pools. Photography and detailed notes are essential to record the location, size, and shape of each bloodstain.
Once located, blood samples must be collected using sterile techniques to prevent contamination. Liquid blood is typically collected with a sterile swab or pipette, while dried bloodstains may be scraped or cut from the surface.
Each sample is then carefully packaged and labeled, ensuring a clear chain of custody is maintained throughout the investigation. Proper storage, often involving refrigeration, is vital to prevent degradation of the sample and preserve its integrity for analysis.
Suspect Identification Through Blood Typing
Blood typing can significantly aid in suspect identification by comparing the blood type of a suspect to that found at the crime scene. While blood typing alone cannot definitively identify a suspect, it can provide valuable leads and narrow the pool of potential perpetrators.
If a suspect's blood type matches the blood type found at the scene, it places them within a group of individuals who could have been the source of the blood. This information, combined with other evidence, can strengthen the case against a suspect.
The Power of Exclusion
Perhaps even more importantly, blood typing can definitively exclude suspects. If a suspect's blood type is different from the blood type found at the scene, they can be immediately eliminated from consideration. This can save valuable time and resources by focusing the investigation on other potential suspects.
Identifying Victims
In cases where the victim is unknown or cannot be easily identified, blood typing can be a crucial tool for identification. By comparing the blood type of an unidentified body to missing persons records or family members, investigators can potentially establish the victim's identity.
This is particularly important in mass casualty events or cases involving severely decomposed remains. In these situations, traditional methods of identification, such as fingerprinting or facial recognition, may not be possible.
Blood typing, combined with other forensic techniques, can provide a vital link in restoring identity to the deceased and providing closure to their loved ones.
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) and Blood Typing
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) is the interpretation of bloodstains at a crime scene to determine the events that caused them. By analyzing the size, shape, distribution, and location of bloodstains, investigators can reconstruct the sequence of events that occurred during a crime.
While BPA focuses on the physical characteristics of bloodstains, blood typing provides additional information about the blood itself. The combination of these two techniques can provide a more complete understanding of the crime.
For example, if BPA indicates that a blood spatter resulted from a high-velocity impact, such as a gunshot, blood typing can confirm that the blood originated from the victim or the suspect.
This correlation between BPA and blood typing can strengthen the evidence presented in court and provide a more compelling narrative of the crime.
Connecting the Dots: Linking Crime Aspects
Blood evidence can serve as a crucial link connecting various aspects of a crime, solidifying the narrative and strengthening the prosecution's case.
For instance, blood found on a suspect's clothing can be linked to the victim, placing the suspect at the scene of the crime. Similarly, blood found at multiple crime scenes can connect seemingly unrelated incidents, potentially revealing a pattern of criminal activity.
This ability to connect different aspects of a crime through blood evidence highlights the importance of meticulous crime scene investigation and thorough forensic analysis.
In conclusion, while DNA analysis has revolutionized forensic science, blood typing remains a valuable tool in crime scene investigation. Its applications in evidence collection, suspect and victim identification, bloodstain pattern analysis, and linking crime aspects solidify its continued relevance in the pursuit of justice.
The discovery of distinct blood groups transformed criminology, offering a new lens through which investigators could view crime scenes. But understanding its history and scientific underpinnings is only part of the story. The true impact of blood typing is revealed when we examine its practical application in crime scene investigations, where it becomes a tangible tool in the pursuit of justice.
The Lab's Perspective: Blood Analysis in Forensic Laboratories
Once blood evidence has been carefully collected and documented at a crime scene, its journey continues to the forensic laboratory. Here, skilled analysts employ a range of techniques to determine the blood type and glean any other relevant information that can aid the investigation.
The analysis within a forensic laboratory is a meticulous and multi-staged process, each step designed to ensure accuracy and reliability of results.
Initial Examination and Documentation
Upon arrival at the lab, each blood sample undergoes a thorough initial examination.
This includes verifying the chain of custody, documenting the sample's condition, and assigning a unique laboratory identification number.
Photographs are often taken to visually record the sample's appearance, size, and any visible characteristics.
This detailed documentation serves as a crucial reference point throughout the analysis process.
Preliminary Testing: Presumptive vs. Confirmatory Tests
Forensic blood analysis typically begins with presumptive tests.
These tests are designed to indicate the possible presence of blood, even if it's not immediately visible to the naked eye.
Common presumptive tests include the Kastle-Meyer test, which uses phenolphthalein and hydrogen peroxide to detect the presence of hemoglobin.
A positive result from a presumptive test suggests the sample is likely blood, but it's not definitive.
Confirmatory tests are then performed to definitively identify the substance as human blood.
One such test is the Takayama test, which involves forming crystals of pyridine ferroprotoporphyrin, identifiable under a microscope.
These tests are critical to confirm that any observed substance is actually blood, especially in complex crime scene environments.
Blood Group Determination: ABO and Rh Typing
Once the presence of human blood is confirmed, the next step is to determine the blood type.
This is typically done using agglutination tests, where known antibodies are mixed with the blood sample.
If the blood cells clump together (agglutinate), it indicates the presence of the corresponding antigen.
For ABO typing, the blood is tested with anti-A and anti-B antibodies.
Agglutination with anti-A indicates Type A blood; agglutination with anti-B indicates Type B blood; agglutination with both indicates Type AB blood; and no agglutination indicates Type O blood.
Rh typing involves testing for the presence of the Rh D antigen.
If the antigen is present, the blood is Rh-positive; if absent, it's Rh-negative.
Additional Analysis: Beyond Blood Typing
While ABO and Rh typing are fundamental, forensic laboratories often conduct additional analyses on blood samples.
These may include tests to identify the presence of drugs or alcohol, which can provide further context to the crime.
DNA analysis, although more commonly used for identification purposes, can also be performed on blood samples in the forensic lab.
Quality Control and Assurance
Throughout the entire process, forensic laboratories adhere to strict quality control and assurance protocols.
This includes using calibrated equipment, following standardized procedures, and implementing blind proficiency testing.
These measures ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results, which are critical for their admissibility in court.
The meticulous analysis of blood samples in forensic laboratories plays a pivotal role in criminal investigations. By accurately determining blood types and gleaning other relevant information, forensic scientists provide crucial evidence that can help solve crimes and bring justice to victims.
The meticulous analysis within a forensic laboratory can reveal crucial details about blood evidence. Yet, despite its historical significance and continued utility, it's vital to recognize the limitations of blood typing, especially when juxtaposed with the capabilities of modern DNA analysis.
Limitations of Blood Typing: Understanding the Constraints
While blood typing has long served as a valuable tool in forensic investigations, it's crucial to acknowledge its constraints, especially when compared to the precision of DNA analysis. Understanding these limitations is vital for investigators and legal professionals alike. It is critical to understand the challenges of working with compromised samples and recognizing the paramount importance of meticulous evidence collection and preservation.
Limited Discriminatory Power Compared to DNA
One of the most significant limitations of blood typing lies in its relatively low discriminatory power.
The ABO and Rh systems divide the population into a limited number of groups.
This means that a large percentage of individuals may share the same blood type.
Unlike DNA analysis, which can provide a unique genetic fingerprint, blood typing can only narrow down a suspect pool to a certain extent.
For example, if a suspect's blood type matches that found at a crime scene, it only indicates that they could be among the group of people with that specific blood type.
It is not definitive proof of their involvement.
Challenges with Degraded or Contaminated Samples
The reliability of blood typing can also be significantly affected by the condition of the sample.
Degraded or contaminated samples pose substantial challenges to accurate analysis.
Environmental factors like heat, humidity, and sunlight can degrade blood samples over time, affecting the integrity of the antigens and antibodies.
Similarly, contamination from other substances can interfere with the testing process.
In such cases, interpreting the results becomes problematic, and the accuracy of the blood type determination may be compromised.
Analysts need to carefully assess the condition of the sample and apply appropriate techniques to mitigate the effects of degradation or contamination.
It is important to acknowledge the potential for error in these situations.
The Importance of Proper Evidence Collection
Proper evidence collection is paramount in forensic science.
It is critical to preventing errors and ensuring the integrity of blood typing results.
The way blood evidence is collected, handled, and stored can significantly impact the accuracy of subsequent analysis.
Improper collection techniques, such as using contaminated tools or failing to properly preserve the sample, can lead to inaccurate results or even render the sample unusable.
To avoid these issues, forensic personnel must adhere to strict protocols for evidence collection.
This includes wearing appropriate personal protective equipment, using sterile collection tools, and properly packaging and storing the samples to prevent degradation or contamination.
A detailed chain of custody must also be maintained to track the movement of the evidence from the crime scene to the laboratory.
Blood Typing vs. DNA Analysis: A Modern Comparison
The meticulous analysis within a forensic laboratory can reveal crucial details about blood evidence. Yet, despite its historical significance and continued utility, it's vital to recognize the limitations of blood typing, especially when juxtaposed with the capabilities of modern DNA analysis.
As forensic science has advanced, DNA analysis has emerged as a powerful tool, largely eclipsing blood typing in many criminal investigations. However, this doesn't render blood typing obsolete. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each method is crucial for investigators seeking justice and truth.
Contrasting Methodologies: Advantages and Disadvantages
Both blood typing and DNA analysis have distinct advantages and disadvantages that determine their applicability in different forensic scenarios.
Blood typing offers speed and cost-effectiveness. The procedures are relatively simple and can be performed quickly, making it useful for rapid screening and preliminary investigations. However, its discriminatory power is limited, as many individuals share the same blood type.
DNA analysis, on the other hand, provides a highly specific genetic fingerprint. This enables definitive identification and exclusion of suspects.
The disadvantages of DNA analysis include the time and cost involved. It also requires higher-quality samples and specialized equipment and expertise.
Feature | Blood Typing | DNA Analysis |
---|---|---|
Discriminatory Power | Low | High |
Speed | Fast | Slower |
Cost | Low | High |
Sample Quality | More tolerant to degradation | Requires higher quality |
Expertise Required | Less Specialized | Highly Specialized |
The Rise of DNA: Why It Became the Primary Method
DNA analysis has largely replaced blood typing as the primary method of identification in forensic investigations due to its superior discriminatory power.
The ability to generate a unique genetic profile from biological samples provides a level of certainty that blood typing cannot match.
This precision is critical in establishing guilt or innocence, especially in high-stakes criminal cases.
Furthermore, DNA technology has become increasingly sensitive, allowing for analysis of even minute or degraded samples.
This sensitivity broadens the scope of forensic investigations and enhances the likelihood of obtaining usable evidence.
Blood Typing's Enduring Relevance: Niche Applications
Despite the dominance of DNA analysis, blood typing continues to play a valuable role in specific situations.
Rapid Screening: In scenarios where a quick preliminary assessment is needed, blood typing can rapidly narrow down the pool of potential suspects. This is particularly useful at the initial stages of an investigation.
Budget Constraints: DNA analysis can be expensive, particularly when multiple samples need processing. Blood typing offers a more affordable alternative in resource-limited settings.
Degraded Samples: While DNA analysis requires high-quality samples, blood typing can sometimes yield results even when DNA is too degraded for analysis.
This makes blood typing a viable option when dealing with old or poorly preserved evidence.
Mass Disaster Identification: In mass disasters, where numerous victims need to be identified quickly, blood typing can be a useful triage tool. It aids in sorting and prioritizing samples for more detailed DNA analysis.
Historical Cases: In older cases where DNA evidence is not available or has been compromised, blood typing may be the only available method for analysis. This can be crucial in resolving cold cases and bringing closure to victims and their families.
Future Trajectory: The Evolving Role of Blood Typing in Forensics
While DNA analysis currently dominates forensic science, the narrative isn't one of complete obsolescence for blood typing. Instead, the future likely holds a redefined, more specialized role for serological techniques, augmented by technological advancements and integrated data systems. Blood typing's strengths in speed and cost-effectiveness, coupled with innovative approaches, could ensure its enduring relevance in specific contexts.
Advancements in Serological Techniques
The field of serology is not stagnant. Research continues to refine existing blood typing methods and explore new techniques that can extract more information from blood samples.
One promising area is the development of more sensitive and specific antibody-based assays. These advanced assays could potentially identify subtypes within ABO and Rh systems, increasing the discriminatory power of blood typing.
Furthermore, research into analyzing other blood group systems beyond ABO and Rh could offer additional markers for identification. These systems, while less common, could prove valuable in narrowing down suspect pools, especially in cases where DNA analysis is not feasible or conclusive.
Integration with Forensic Databases
The true potential of blood typing may lie in its integration with broader forensic databases. While a single blood type may not uniquely identify an individual, it can significantly reduce the number of potential matches when combined with other data.
Linking blood type information with existing DNA databases, fingerprint records, and even demographic data could create a multi-layered identification system. This integrated approach would allow investigators to quickly filter and prioritize potential suspects, saving valuable time and resources.
Imagine a scenario where a partial DNA profile is obtained from a crime scene, but it's insufficient for a definitive match. By cross-referencing the DNA data with blood type information from a separate database, investigators could narrow the search to individuals with compatible blood types, focusing their efforts on a smaller, more relevant subset of the population.
The Continued Role in Specific Investigations
Despite the rise of DNA analysis, blood typing retains a crucial role in certain types of investigations:
-
Mass Disaster Identification: In mass casualty events, where DNA samples may be degraded or unavailable, blood typing can provide a rapid means of identifying victims and assisting in the process of repatriation.
-
Resource-Limited Settings: In countries or regions with limited access to advanced forensic technology, blood typing offers a cost-effective and readily available method for initial screening and investigation.
-
Preliminary Screening: Blood typing serves as a triage tool. It quickly eliminates suspects based on blood type incompatibilities before investing in more time-consuming DNA analysis.
-
Historical Cases: In cases where DNA evidence is no longer available or has been compromised, blood typing may be the only viable option for obtaining any type of forensic information.
-
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) Context: While BPA focuses on the physical characteristics of bloodstains, knowing the blood type present can add another layer of information and aid in crime scene reconstruction.
By recognizing these specialized applications and embracing technological advancements, blood typing can continue to contribute meaningfully to the pursuit of justice. Its value lies not in replacing DNA analysis but in complementing it, offering a versatile and adaptable tool within the broader forensic landscape.
Video: Blood Typing in Crime: Unlocking Justice at the Cellular Level
Blood Typing in Crime: Frequently Asked Questions
This section answers common questions about the role of blood typing in criminal investigations, providing clarity on how this technique helps unlock justice at the cellular level.
How is blood typing used in crime scene investigations?
Blood typing, or blood group determination, is used to narrow down the pool of potential suspects by comparing the blood type found at a crime scene to the blood types of individuals involved. Because not everyone shares the same blood type, this process helps investigators quickly exclude individuals who could not have been the source of the blood sample. Therefore, what is the purpose of blood typing in criminalogy is to eliminate suspects and provide valuable leads.
Can blood typing alone definitively identify a criminal?
No, blood typing alone cannot definitively identify a criminal with 100% certainty. While it can exclude individuals as potential sources, multiple people share the same blood type. It serves as preliminary evidence. More precise DNA analysis is required for conclusive identification.
What if the blood sample is degraded or very small?
Even with degraded or small blood samples, forensic scientists can often still determine the blood type. Advanced techniques allow for analysis even when the sample is not in perfect condition. However, significantly degraded samples can impact the reliability of the result.
Is blood typing still relevant with modern DNA analysis techniques?
Yes, blood typing remains relevant, even with modern DNA analysis. It acts as a cost-effective and rapid initial screening method. It allows investigators to prioritize which samples to send for the more expensive and time-consuming DNA analysis, thereby optimizing resources. In this way, what is the purpose of blood typing in criminalogy is to help manage crime investigation resources effectively.
So, there you have it! Hopefully, you now have a much better understanding of what is the purpose of blood typing in criminalogy and how vital this technique is in solving crimes. Keep exploring, and remember, science is always on our side!